Former Public Service Secretary Criticizes Politicians' Behavior in Senate Estimates

Image credits: By Claire Sams

The behavior of some politicians in Senate estimates has been criticized by Ray Griggs, the former Secretary of the Department of Social Services. Griggs, who recently retired from his position, stated that the relationship between senior public servants and some politicians has reached a "nadir" with Senate estimates being the focal point of this deterioration. He emphasized that there is an enormous power imbalance when public servants appear before parliamentary committees, with most parliamentarians understanding and respecting this, but some adopting a combative approach in hopes of gaining media attention.

Griggs pointed out that the largest factor contributing to the increase in Comcare claims across the public service is related to mental health, with many public servants being "destroyed" and "damaged" during estimates hearings. He attributed this deterioration to the use of estimates to generate social media grabs for political purposes, as well as a wider decline in trust in government that coincided with the COVID pandemic. Griggs also highlighted the importance of ensuring a broad range of views can contribute to policy in his department, citing the example of a bathroom designed to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities at the department's headquarters.

Griggs' comments were made during his valedictory address at the National Press Club, where he reflected on his time in the public service, including his role as Chief of Navy and Vice Chief of the Australian Defence Force. He emphasized the need for public servants to be treated with respect and dignity, particularly in the context of Senate estimates, where they are compelled to respond to questions from politicians. Griggs' remarks have sparked a debate about the role of Senate estimates and the behavior of politicians towards public servants, with some arguing that the process has become too politicized and others defending it as a necessary mechanism for holding the government to account.

A list of key points from Griggs' address includes: * The behavior of some politicians in Senate estimates has become increasingly personal and nasty * There is an enormous power imbalance between politicians and public servants in Senate estimates * The largest factor contributing to Comcare claims is related to mental health * The use of estimates to generate social media grabs for political purposes has contributed to the deterioration of the relationship between politicians and public servants * Ensuring a broad range of views can contribute to policy is crucial for effective governance * Public servants should be treated with respect and dignity, particularly in the context of Senate estimates.

The issue of politicians' behavior in Senate estimates has been a topic of discussion among stakeholders, with some arguing that it is a necessary mechanism for holding the government to account, while others see it as an opportunity for political grandstanding. Griggs' comments have added to this debate, highlighting the need for respect and dignity in the treatment of public servants. As the public service continues to evolve, it is essential to consider the impact of politicians' behavior on the mental health and wellbeing of public servants, as well as the broader implications for governance and accountability.