Trump Administration's Impact on Global Health and Fertility Treatments

Image credits: Pool via AP

The Trump administration's recent actions have sparked concerns and discussions about the impact on global health and fertility treatments. U.S. Senator Cory Booker, along with 21 colleagues, has led the charge in calling on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to restore funding for global health, development, and humanitarian programs. The senators emphasized the national security imperatives of U.S. global health efforts, which keep Americans safe, strengthen U.S. leadership, and increase global stability. They expressed concern that without American global health programs, current outbreaks of infectious diseases like Ebola, Marburg Virus, and Bird Flu have the potential for spreading to U.S. soil.

In a separate move, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aiming to reduce the costs of in vitro fertilization (IVF), a medical procedure that helps people facing infertility build their families. The order instructed the assistant to the president for domestic policy to provide policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and "aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment" within 90 days. This move has been met with cautious optimism from local organizations, who hope to see costs go down but do not want anyone to be left out. The use of IVF has become increasingly common, with about 6 in 10 U.S. adults supporting protecting access to it, according to a June poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

The global health community has been affected by the Trump administration's actions, with the foreign assistance funding freeze stopping critical Malaria interventions and pausing many clinical trials and data collection endeavors. The senators warned that Russian leaders have publicly praised the decision to dismantle USAID, an agency that helps counter China's efforts to expand its Belt and Road Initiative in Africa and Latin America. Additionally, China is already stepping in to fill the vacuum left by the United States at the World Health Organization. The national security implications of these actions are significant, and the senators urged Secretary Rubio to reverse the damaging personnel actions at USAID and swiftly restart U.S. investments in global health, development, and humanitarian aid.

Local organizations have reacted to President Trump's IVF executive order with a mix of optimism and caution. Executive director of AllPaths Family Building, Kate Weldon LeBlanc, stated that reducing the cost of IVF treatments would allow more people to start building their families sooner and have more success. Medical director of Northeastern Reproductive Medicine Jennifer Brown added that reducing the barrier of cost and insurance not covering it would help people achieve cheaper care because they would be more successful more quickly. However, Mary Hahn Beerworth with Vermont Right to Life expressed concerns about the lack of consistent oversight over the practice of IVF and hopes to see regulations for clinics.

In conclusion, the Trump administration's actions have significant implications for global health and fertility treatments. While the executive order on IVF aims to increase access to fertility treatments, the restoration of global health programs is crucial for maintaining national security and global stability. The global health community must continue to advocate for the importance of these programs and ensure that any changes do not harm or leave people behind. As the situation continues to evolve, it is essential to monitor the impact of these actions and work towards finding solutions that prioritize the well-being of individuals and communities around the world.