Vicky Kaushal's Chhaava Embroiled in Historical Misrepresentation Controversy
Image credits: Source Link
The latest Bollywood release, Chhaava, starring Vicky Kaushal, has been making waves at the box office, raking in an impressive Rs 444.50 crore worldwide within just 10 days of its release. However, despite its commercial success, the film has found itself embroiled in multiple controversies, with the latest being allegations of historical misrepresentation. The descendants of Ganoji and Kanhoji Shirke, two significant historical figures portrayed in the film, have accused the filmmakers of misrepresenting their ancestors, sparking outrage and a threatened Rs 100 crore defamation lawsuit.
The film, which chronicles the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, has been accused of distorting historical facts, with the Shirke family claiming that the portrayal of their ancestors is inaccurate and tarnishes their legacy. According to Laxmikant Raje Shirke, the 13th descendant of Ganoji and Kanhoji Shirke, the film's depiction of the warriors is false and has caused harm to the family's reputation. The family has also claimed that they had approached the filmmakers before the release of the film, informing them of the inaccuracies, but their concerns were ignored. Director Laxman Utekar has since issued a public apology, stating that the film's intention was never to hurt the Shirke family and that he sincerely apologizes for any pain caused.
The controversy surrounding Chhaava has sparked a wider debate about the representation of historical figures in films and the need for accuracy and sensitivity. The film's storyline, which is based on a novel by Sivaji Sawant, has been accused of being a work of fiction and imagination, rather than a factual account of historical events. The Shirke family has pointed out that there is no historical evidence to support the claims made in the film and that the novel itself was published without any basis in fact. The family has also claimed that the film's portrayal of their ancestors as traitors is false and has caused harm to their reputation, with Deepak Raje Shirke stating that the family will continue to pursue legal measures against the film and plan protests to bring attention to the issue.
Some of the key issues with the film's portrayal of historical events include the depiction of Ganoji and Kanhoji Shirke as betraying Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, which the family claims is false and has no basis in historical fact. The family has also pointed out that the film's storyline is inconsistent with the historical record, with the diary of Francis Martin, a French officer who served as an envoy in the Maratha court, revealing that it was the scribes of the court who betrayed Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, rather than the Shirke family. The family has also claimed that the film's portrayal of their ancestors is inaccurate and misleading, and that it has caused harm to their reputation and legacy.
The controversy surrounding Chhaava has highlighted the need for filmmakers to be responsible and sensitive when portraying historical figures and events. The film's commercial success has been overshadowed by the backlash from the Shirke family and other historians, who have accused the filmmakers of prioritizing entertainment value over historical accuracy. The incident has also sparked a wider debate about the representation of historical figures in films and the need for greater sensitivity and respect for the past. Some of the other films that have faced similar controversies in the past include:
- Padmaavat
- Jodhaa Akbar
- Bajirao Mastani
Related Tags