The US Supreme Court has made a significant decision in the case of Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma man who has been on death row for over 25 years. The court has thrown out his murder conviction and death penalty, citing prosecutorial misconduct and violation of his constitutional rights to a fair trial. This decision comes after Glossip's lawyers and the state's Republican attorney general joined forces to argue that his trial was unfair. The case has garnered significant attention due to the unusual alliance between Glossip's defense team and the state's attorney general, who sought a new trial for the inmate.

The Supreme Court's decision was based on the fact that prosecutors allowed a key witness to give false testimony, which violated Glossip's constitutional right to a fair trial. The witness, Justin Sneed, had admitted to killing the motel owner, Barry Van Treese, but claimed that Glossip had paid him to do so. However, it was later discovered that Sneed had lied about his psychiatric condition and his reason for taking the mood-stabilizing drug lithium. The court ruled that the prosecution's failure to correct Sneed's false testimony was a violation of Glossip's rights, and that he is therefore entitled to a new trial.

Glossip has maintained his innocence for 27 years, and his case has been marked by multiple appeals and stays of execution. He has been scheduled for execution nine separate times and has eaten three "last meals" while awaiting his fate. The new trial will provide Glossip with the opportunity to present his case again and potentially prove his innocence. The state of Oklahoma will now have to decide whether to retry Glossip, and if so, how to proceed with the case.

The decision has been welcomed by Glossip's lawyers and supporters, who have argued that his trial was unfair and that he deserves a new chance to prove his innocence. The case has also highlighted the importance of ensuring that defendants receive a fair trial, and that prosecutors do not withhold evidence or allow false testimony to be presented. The Supreme Court's decision is a significant victory for Glossip and his supporters, and it will be closely watched as the case moves forward.

The timeline of events in Glossip's case is as follows: * 1997: Barry Van Treese is killed at the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City * 1998: Glossip is convicted of murder and sentenced to death * 2001: Glossip's conviction is overturned, and he is granted a new trial * 2004: Glossip is convicted again and sentenced to death * 2015: Glossip's execution is stayed due to concerns about the lethal injection process * 2023: The Supreme Court intervenes in Glossip's case, and he is granted a new trial * 2025: The Supreme Court throws out Glossip's murder conviction and death penalty, citing prosecutorial misconduct and violation of his constitutional rights to a fair trial. The decision has significant implications for the criminal justice system, and it will be closely watched by legal experts and advocates for death row inmates.